Hey Everybody in Portland Computer Repair Land,
test – <a href=”http://technorati.com/claim/g7j2ctmcz4″ rel=”me”>Technorati Profile</a>
We are considering adding another technician to the family here and, as resumes are on my mind, I thought I would spend a few minutes talking about what it takes to become a Happy Hamster Technician. We take hiring extremely seriously and we interview and weed very aggressively. When we hire, applications come in by the score because we offer the absolute best work environment for computer repair contractors in the city. First, we pay better, much better, than anybody else. Our contractors make upwards of 20% more than they would elsewhere. Second, our zero-upsell policy makes people here a lot more comfortable in their work. Our technicians do their jobs as best they can, without regard to profit. Third, our extremely flexible customer service policy makes it easy to do your job here. Our technicians have broad authority to give discounts, offer free upgrades, or to do whatever else is necessary to satisfy the customer without checking in with the home office. Basically, I trust the people I hire to do the job as well I would, and I give them the freedom to do so. For these and a host of other reasons, people want to work here.
Unfortunately, though, that creates a lot of work for me! A recent job posting for a Portland technician brought in north of a hundred resumes, so I would like to talk about how we get from one hundred to one (or sometimes zero).
The first premise I keep in mind is that we do not ever need to hire somebody. Recently I sought a technician to cover the Beaverton area. None of the applicants who applied were a good fit, so we decided to make due with current resources for the moment. Knowing that we can choose to hire or not gives me the flexibility to not have to think, “Well, maybe this one is good enough…”
From here the actual selection process begins. First, I ask a few open ended computer repair questions in the application form and instruct applicants to send answers along with their resume. A surprisingly large number of people, something like 50%, either ignore or choose not to answer these questions. They are all instantly deleted. From the remaining 50%, I evaluate the quality of their answers in two ways: technically and grammatically. Often people will fail on the technical side of thing, betraying with their vagueness or short answers that they don’t know enough to work here. Sometimes people will fail on a grammatical level, and I mean serious failure: a total lack of punctuation or abysmal spelling. (I’m not docking people for just missing a period.) This process weeds out another 40% or so, leaving us with about 10% of candidates who might have a shot.
After the resume weed out comes my least favorite part of the job: phone screens. I hate phone screens because they take up so much time. Inevitably a few candidates will fail before we even speak. Always one or two individual choose to have extraordinarily juvenile answering machine messages (swearing on the outgoing message, or something silly like, “I’m too cool to answer your call right now so leave a message”), which betray a lack of forethought that makes me think that person is not well suited to a job that requires so much close detail work.
Many of the rest are eliminated based on the call. This job requires the customer to put a huge amount of trust in the technicians, so a technician must be able to quickly and easily form a connection with a customer on the phone that says “I’m competent, I hear you, and I can and will help you.” Often people fail at this from the word go. Many phone screens, whether the applicant knows it or not, end at the first “hello.” A wobbly/hung over/weak/uninspired greeting can be the end of a chance to work here. For those who sound good at hello, I chit chat for a few minutes and ask a few very broad, no-right-answer technical questions. With these questions I look not just for the correct answer but for the thought process the applicant uses to arrive at that answer. Few people pass this test. For those few the hardest part still remains: the interview.
Our interview takes place in three parts. First, again, is the hello. Some applicants fail before they walk in the door. People who arrive late to the interview, even by just 5-10 minutes, have almost no shot; I don’t trust you to be on time to my clients if you can’t be on time to your own interview. Others fail for how they’ve chosen to dress: torn baggy jeans and a hoodie or, in one very strange case, the remains of a tuxedo the candidate had clearly slept in the night before. After getting through the door, candidates spend about half an hour with Zia as she acts the part of a confused customer, drawing explanations out of the applicant. Here we test to see how well people can explain technical concepts in non-technical language. Again, more candidates are lost. Technical knowledge has no value here without the ability to explain it in plain English. Finally, if candidates pass Zia’s questions, I come and do the technical interview. I ask hard questions, some factual, some scenario based, to see both what somebody knows and how they think. Only after passing this final interview do we consider extending an offer to an applicant.
Only five people of the hundreds who have applied have made it through this entire process, and I’m proud to say that they represent the absolute best the city has to offer. We have built our reputation on both the quality of our knowledge and our ability to relate to our customers. The work it takes to select the elite few to do that job is time consuming but entirely worth it for the result. I couldn’t be any happier with the crew we’ve assembled here.
Thanks everybody,
-Zac